Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
属于越看越精彩的类型，冷酷无情的脑洞，各色怪兽的集合，最终回归到宇宙星辰，道不尽的库布里克
定格动画的布景能做到这种程度令人惊叹。前30min还像是线性的故事，随后就真得就是一个无比诡谲多变的梦魇，试图从中去理解具体的意义本身就反意义，如同做梦一样，感觉大于内容本身。
首先画面材质光影表现是一绝 全篇基调是阴暗癫狂的，从各种细节能看出是对人类造成的疯狂社会终点的隐喻 很多事情都是毫无意义的过程，在其中诞生，挣扎再毁灭，让这一切开始又放任其堕落腐烂的神是不是疯了
一部形式大于内容，但把形式推向极致的高级艺术寓言。
很重口 简直了 这片子真的简直了 想说些什么 但啥也说不出来
诡异疯癫、变态疯狂、血腥暴力。隐喻大量信息，似懂非懂～膜拜。
不禁张大嘴巴，啧啧称奇。有些画面极易引起不适。部分影评谈此片基于旧约圣经，如此云云。
无序中显现有序，丑恶中浮现美丽，一部十分疯狂且优秀的幻想之作
bloody hell. 异形宝宝也要接受社会调剂。
我不能说我看懂了，我的理解是疯狂的人类，压榨、利用、贪婪、战争、恶欲。
很顶，四舍五入有我的梦一半那么HiFi吧
剧情很一般，最后另一边还在等吧
着实挺震撼的，震撼与几十年的定格动画与电影视效经验所成就出来的一种多技术媒介结合下来的疯狂想象，里面对于每一个环节所运用的技术和方法都有着非常巧妙地设计，所以成就出一种非常癫狂的多维世界。感觉随便一个场景或者是形象都可以拿出来延展成一套设定和故事，但实际上整个电影却仍然根植着非常深的宗教思想，从开篇的巴别塔到，到所有片子中展示出的被惩戒的生灵与肉体，到后面的人类战争与混沌直到最后一切回归到一种宇宙的永恒秩序中，每一个部分都有着非常值得玩味地解读空间，确实很疯
过于不适 无法忍受。太多的重口，导致我无法get作者的隐喻
就像你生活中遇到那种，你得承认他真的真的很牛逼，但就是没办法和他做朋友那种人
满足了我对cult片的所有想法 既邪又难懂 脏兮兮的噩梦 片尾血液繁衍生命宇宙不停的闪进莫名让我很兴奋😳
牛逼闪闪，充满想象力，也运用了几乎一切可以搭配的不同材质的绘画雕塑装置等艺术风格 以及大胆地真人与动画与不同像素级别的特效影像结合，从头到尾就是人类命运寓言
1.导演绝对玩过inside；
因果循环，从诞生到毁灭，再诞生再毁灭，一切从混沌中来，又归于混沌。
真的 一看就是歪果仁搞出來的
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
