Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
也有不太严谨的地方，但现在还愿意尝试这种风格，还能完成得这么好的片子，必须五星致敬。同类可看《夺魂索》《足迹》《死亡计中计》《暂无出口》《在糟糕的日子里》
Berlinale居然会入没想到 肯定又有人要出来说这说那了（嘻嘻）剧情本身不反套路吗？挺棒的啊 也许我对黑帮题材本来就有滤镜吧 这是“凡人”也有搞翻（搅屎）帮派的典范哈哈哈哈哈 😃😃😃
就在我以为是父女温情故事的时候，又翻了一下，可以加一颗星。
预料到了twist却没有想到这么精致精彩！ 今年院线最喜欢的一部电影了！尤其是没有拖到两个小时+，全部在小裁缝店完成，老电影感十足。天啊快去看！
好好看！我永远喜爱这样优雅的角色优雅的故事。一个裁缝店三个房间完成全部的故事，工整漂亮。这种片最考验表演和台词了，Rylance完成得太好了，被惊艳到。没有一处废笔，连开头cutter讲述剪裁的独白都是埋好的线，最后十分钟依然能制造惊喜给你。/另外Rylance在这里声音太好听了，这部的配乐也很不错。
充满张力的舞台剧既视感
单一场景，密集的台词，精湛的演技，几重反转。被这种虽然老派但教科书般的小成本话剧电影拿捏的死死的，干了一杯陈年佳酿的感觉。3.5⭐
“打好领带，是人生中重要的第1步。”
我不是tailor，我是cutter，的确是这回事，最后是个throat cutter。老爷子演得真不错。#20220605
单一场景，非常话剧感的悬疑片，最后一段弗朗西斯又起来后的反转稍显多余，破坏了全片既紧张又从容的节奏感
剧本的张力真的不错，不过也有些地方看的有些捉急，结尾有点可惜，我觉得老爷子要是能一直稳到最后就更好了。
葬礼上那个笑话颇有坟头蹦迪的功效，那是北野武骨子里最糙的温柔。
单一空间悬疑片，结构非常工整，商业类型片的标本。改编舞台剧和翻拍都是很好的选题。
蛮有趣的话剧式电影，非常明显的人物上场再退场以串联故事，但作为悬疑色彩这么重的片子，结局却唐突又情理之外，这太糟糕了。
所以，《The Outfit》应该译作《马甲》或《绝不抛头》。
最后北野武回到浅草法兰西座以前的一幕幕涌回来，我快要哭了。柳乐优弥演得真的太棒了！
发现网飞出的跟漫才相关的剧都很好看，柳乐优弥真真剧抛脸，演得真不错。最后十分钟泪点集中爆发，鼻酸。但是整体来讲有些平淡，3.7分。
ps：瑞奇好帥！
短小但不够精悍，前50分钟比较乏味。后续的故事，也颇有种为反转而反转的意味，因为老头的计划达成得太顺利，显得黑帮很蠢。最后又翻出老头的真实身份，固然很帅，但有些画蛇添足。
50年代芝加哥黑帮的子弹都打不死人，男朋友死了也不会落泪。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
